top of page

Past Reader Surveys

Responses to Our reader Survey Dated 7/29/24

 

The Question: If you were to recommend up to three books (or other documents) for incoming freshmen to read, what would they be?

 

Responses:

__________________________________________________________________________________________________​

  • “Darkness at Noon” by Arthur Koestler

  • “Federalist Paper No. 10” by James Madison

  • “Capitalism and Freedom” by Milton Friedman

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • "Reading the Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism” by Justice Stephen Breyer

  • "A Theory of Justice” (Chapter 5, “The Problem of Justice Between Generations”) by John Rawls 

  • "Plato’s Ethics"

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • "The Screwtape Letters" by C.S. Lewis

  • "Anna Karenina" by Leo Tolstoy

  • "The Count of Monte Cristo" by Alexandre Dumas 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • The Declaration of Independence

  • The Constitution of the U.S.A.

  • "Guns, Germs, and Steel" by Jared Diamond

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • "The Revolutionary: Samuel Adams" by Stacy Schiff

  • "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism" by Shoshanna Zuboff

  • "The Invisible Bridge" by Julie Orringer

 

The Revolutionary: Samuel Adams by Stacy Schiff brings to light the historical struggles and perseverance of our founding fathers: a reminder of the price paid and sacrifices made by those fighting for our Nation’s freedom. The Invisible Bridge by Julie Orringer portrays the lives of Hungarian Jewish people during World War II. It’s a chilling remembrance of antisemitism and the horrific suffering it caused in the past. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism by Shoshanna Zuboff is a must read to understand the business model of today’s social media companies and while the services of Google, Facebook and others are free, there are hidden “costs” that may become regretful, as we navigate life without privacy, constant surveillance and nefarious ways the data collected could be used in the future, i.e., to control people’s lives.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • Declaration of Independence

  • U.S. Constitution

  • Brown v. Board of Education

​

Democracy depends upon an informed citizenry. Stanford students should have a lifetime knowledge of documents that are fundamental to our nation’s past, present and future. These three documents also could be the focus for breakout sessions during new student orientation and where incoming students learn the disciplines of careful reading and critical thinking as well as how to express and listen to competing viewpoints.

________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • "Integrity" by Stephen L. Carter

  • "Principle-Centered Leadership" by Stephen R. Covey

  • "The Bully Pulpit" by Doris Kearns Goodwin

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • "The Dying Citizen" by Victor Davis Hanson

  • "Social Justice Fallacies" by Thomas Sowell

  • "The Splendid and the Vile" by Erik Larson

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • "Palo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism, and the World" by Malcolm Harris

  • "The Orphan Master's Son" by Adam Johnson (Stanford professor) (or some other fiction by a Stanford author - maybe Steinbeck or Stegner)  

  • "Designing Your Life: How to Build a Well-Lived, Joyful Life" by Bill Burnett and Dave Evans (Stanford professors)

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • "The Price of Silence: The Duke Lacrosse Scandal, the Power of the Elite, and the Corruption of Our Great Universities" by William D. Cohen 

  • "We Were Liars" by E. Lockhart 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • “The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People” by Stephen R. Covey

  • “Man’s Search for Meaning” by Victor E. Frankl

  • “The Giving Tree” by Shel Silverstein

​​

College is not just about completing coursework and earning a degree; it is also a vital period for personal growth, developing emotional intelligence, and cultivating noble principles such as integrity, generosity, and compassion. These life-long endeavors are essential for living a happy and meaningful life. 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • "Fahrenheit 451" by Ray Bradbury

  • "On Tyranny" by Timothy Snyder

  • "The Bells of Nagasaki" by Takashi Nagai

 

These three books are compact in size, but huge in addressing enduring issues in modern (and sometimes much longer) history: authoritarianism, book burning, and the collision of ethics and atomic weaponry. Tim Snyder’s profound scholarship stands behind his slim volume on a current global trend away from democracy. Ray Bradbury’s novel is a grossly underappreciated classic and reminder. Takashi Nagai's story was initially [restricted and/or] banned and then made into a film. It is a stunning example of ethical witness by a survivor of the plutonium bomb dropped on Nagasaki.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • "The Metamorphosis" by Franz Kafka

  • "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

  • "Stranger in a Strange Land" by Robert A.Heinlein

  • "Grapes of Wrath" by John Steinbeck

  • "East of Eden" by John Steinbeck

​

In 80 years of reading everything I could get my hands on, these three are a test for me for being an educated human. Being able to discuss all three is a test of intelligence.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

  1. “Separating Power” by former Stanford president Gerhard Casper

  2. “Guns, Germs, and Steel” by UCLA professor Jared Diamond

  3. “The Coddling of the American Mind” by Stanford alum Greg Lukianoff

​

The first book is a series of essays about decisions and events that shaped the presidency, the courts and much more and continuing to the present. The second book explores how nature, culture and human invention have shaped history. And the third book is an analysis of what has happened to modern college campuses and a challenge to incoming students to think critically and independently. All three books would expose students to concepts worth exploring with classmates and for the rest of their lives. 

Responses to Our Reader Survey Dated 6/14/24

 

The Question:  What Advice would you give to Stanford's incoming freshmen and transfer students?

​

Responses:

​____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Be kind, thoughtful, honest, humble, considerate, respectful, have dignity, and do what you can to make the world a better place. Do not believe everything you read or hear. Question everything. Explore all sides of issues. 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Watch your back, keep your head down and avoid doing anything on campus, off campus or on social media that could be used against you by anyone out to find a reason to cancel you.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Come to Stanford with an open mind. Focus on academics, but make time for fun. Make friends. Get help when you need it. Eat healthful foods, and take time for exercise. Manage stress. Stay safe on campus. Skip the drugs and alcohol.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Remember and obey the Fundamental Standard.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

If the student is not "progressive Identarian" instead believing in classical liberal values, buckle up as it is going to be a "rough" ride for the duration of their time on campus; regardless, don't despair and best wishes.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The Stanford culture ever since its founding is to show humility, not arrogance. Don’t tell everyone you’re there to “change the world,” as seems to have become the Stanford mantra in recent years, even if some day you will in fact help make major changes. Test new ideas but feel free to speak up about what you might think and feel as well. But in the process, be sure you’re drawing out the best in others.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Learn to love the genius of the American Constitution.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Stanford starts late and quarters move fast. Summer will be here before you know it, so you need to start thinking about it now. Sorry.

​

If you're not sure what you want to study, just pick something (for now); it's better than aimless, inchoate course selections. You can always change.

​

Pick a couple extracurriculars and focus on them. You can't do everything, like you probably did in high school.

Have fun! Join in the traditions - FMOTQ, Big Game week activities, Flicks, etc.

Responses to Our Reader Survey Dated 5/1/24 

 

The Question: What are two or three things you would suggest Stanford's leaders should do or continue doing in order to protect free speech while assuring campus safety and operations?

​

Responses:

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________​

Adopt a policy of complete institutional political neutrality.

Exercise the power of this neutrality by sponsoring quality debate - insisting only that space must be given for all views.

Put the learned faculty on center stage in their natural role of developing an evermore higher quality of the discourse.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Expel people who break the law. Protests are fine but breaking the law is unacceptable. Bring in a balanced set of speakers who can explain the history and the politics.... 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

University administrators need to: (1) Identify all non-student demonstrators, arrest them for trespassing at least, and have them removed from the campus; and (2) Suspend or expel students who flaunt university policies, depending on the severity of the infraction. 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Be consistent. No camping means no camping. Take a consistent approach to punishing those who break the rules. To maintain institutional neutrality, you can’t let some violations slide without creating the impression that some points of view are more legitimate than others. Right now, no one believes that protests for an unfashionable cause would be treated with the same restraint that we’re seeing now. Tents should be forcibly removed at sundown. Outsiders should be arrested and prosecuted, and students subjected to the disciplinary process. Laws against covering your face - instituted to fight the Klan - should be enforced. Same goes for anyone - pro-this, anti-that. It should make no difference.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Stanford should do what it can to stop the incessant association linking pro-Palestinian rights and human rights issues, with claims and accusation of antisemitism.…. Protesting against genocide does not equal antisemitism....

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

When I attended Stanford in the 1960s, I led the campus protest movement against the Vietnam War. I was focused on effective persuasion, not venting my anger and causing disruption. Let alone violence. Let me tell that story -- and how it governed my 40 years as a public policy advocate. It explains why the current protests against Israel’s conduct in its war against Hamas have been so completely ineffective. (Full text at our Reader Comments webpage.)

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Put fun back into Stanford's environs.

Reduce the number of administrative staff.

Increase counseling both for mental health as well as post graduation opportunities.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I believe the U of Chicago President perfectly explains the reason for his ultimate intervention re the campus protests at Chicago, as stated here. The Cliff Notes version: “There is no way I would ever compromise on institutional neutrality.”

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Dissolve DEI. Hold students and faculty accountable for disruption of speeches and other events, particularly when the speakers are invited.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Immediately arrest and prosecute anyone who intimidates or attempts to intimidate a speaker on campus. Immediately arrest and prosecute anyone who attempts to block, impede, or otherwise detain a speaker on campus.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

They should continue to keep things quiet on campus and unless there is violence, they should not bring in police, which would just escalate matters. They are referring students participating in the tent camp to internal discipline and there should be significant consequences for these students. No matter what Stanford does, some people will be unhappy but it appears they are doing the best they can in a very difficult situation.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Adopt the Kalven Report's Principles.

End political litmus tests in hiring; end DEI.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Follow your own rules. Allow speech but do not allow protests that block access to buildings or other public spaces. Do not hesitate to use campus or city policy to enforce rules.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Aggressively enforce school policies prohibiting disruptions, camping, etc. Students should be suspended/expelled for rules violations, and outsiders arrested and prosecuted.

Responses to Our Reader Survey Dated 4/1/24 

 

The Question: What should be the two or three highest priorities for Stanford's current or next President?

 

Responses:

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Support free speech.

Eliminate DEI. 

Reduce staff.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Restore a culture of civil debate and disagreement.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

End the DEI Programs NOW, and reassign the administrative staff in that area to other areas.

​

Strengthen programs and add faculty in the Humanities. Focus on broad education for all students, and correct the overemphasis on science and technology. Focus on educating students, not just preparing them to get jobs. Teach tolerance above all.

​

Downsize the administrative staff, and get administrators out of students' lives.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Restore the most critical diversity of an institution worthy of the title "University" - that is, thinking and speaking.

 

Purge the institution of simple minded doctrinaires that make up most of the faculty. Hire people who advocate Socrates' "I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only make them think."

​

Restore merit as the overarching criterion for all things: admissions, grades, faculty hiring, etc.

​

Eliminate all courses and majors that have the word "studies" in their description. By definition they lack range and depth of thought.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Stop policing fun.

Stop policing words.

Start policing violence, vandalism, and intimidation.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Focus the institution fiercely on its academic and scholarly mission.

Cultivate a culture of inquiry, curiosity, and good faith.

Deliver an excellent student experience.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

DEI: get rid of this racist concept. It really means Division, Entitlement, and Inequality.  

Slash the administrative bloat which has more administrators than students.  

Punish and expel anyone who shouts down or suppresses freedom of speech. No exceptions.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________

Chicago Trifecta.

 

Restore ‘fun’ (no ‘neighborhoods,’ Greek and theme houses that match demand, sensible alcohol policy beer=no fear).

 

Reduce administrators/increase faculty.

 

The financial goal of the university should be to return to the founding charter’s requirement for no undergraduate tuition.  [Comment re individual person omitted.]

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Critical thinking and the ability to civilly debate issues, based on factual information, has gradually eroded in our society and divided our country, families and friends, potentially to a point of no return.  It is imperative for our universities/education system to be leaders in the promotion of free speech and debate that transcends today’s political climate.  We are at a critical time in the history of our country where people must be united, not divided.

​

DEI should be abolished due to its hypocrisy. While it is disguised as inclusive, it does not address antisemitism and promotes animosity towards white people, including young children, for the sins of their ancestors towards people of color. 

​

History repeats itself and today’s issues are not new; however, there are now sophisticated (AI) tools to promote nefarious objectives such as censorship, surveillance and controlling the peoples’ behavior.  A thorough understanding of history is imperative in order to see the similarities of what previous generations endured in the fight for freedom of speech and constitutional protections. Stanford should not, in any way, be associated with the tech censorship programs which “appear” to be promoted by Stanford, in name or location.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

An increased focus on the humanities and a mandatory course, like the old Western Civ course, for all freshman.

A reduction in the administrative staff.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Restore freedom of speech on campus, no censorship.

Put a curb on genetic engineering and AI as leading focuses on campus.

Remove the DEI etc. agenda.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Bring back mandatory Western Civ curriculum.

 

Reorient instruction toward truth seeking and critical thinking. Begin by firing any instructor incapable of keeping their political views out of the classroom or unable to dispassionately impart competing viewpoints.

 

Drastically reduce DEI administration and purge the campus of its inclusion in instruction.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The highest priority of any academic institution, particularly one at the level of Stanford, should be the encouragement and tolerance of divergent discourse.  Suppression of free speech, whether it be from a conservative or liberal viewpoint, cannot and should not be tolerated.

 

A secondary priority must be the cutting of the bloated administration. I have read articles pro and con about the "need" for administrators, and I absolutely do not believe the university needs anywhere near the number of administrators it presently has.  Start the cuts with any and all DEI personnel. They are not needed.

 

Students need to feel safe on campus, but not locked-down by administrative shackles.  While Stanford will never likely be as free and fun a place as it was in the past, there needs to be a significant return to a place that is far more open and accepting than now.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I realize my opinions are 'dated' and 'old fashioned', but here goes:

 

Get back 'to basics' by emphasizing a truly, TRADITIONAL, liberal education grounded in the fundamentals of the 'ill-named' "Western Canon";

 

RESTRUCTURE and make 'free standing affiliates' of Stanford, the professional Schools of Business, Law, & Medicine along the lines of the current [uneasy!] relationship between Hoover and Stanford;

 

Require, to the extent lawful & practicable, full financial disclosure of ALL research undertakings of more than 2 years in duration and $5 million dollars of internal AND extramural financial support; &

 

SHRINK the size of the Graduate School enrollment by 1/3 over a ten-year period of time, notwithstanding the suggestion above re: the Professional Schools.  This change will have, IMO, a catalytic impact on the Undergraduate experience for which the Stanfords founded the University in the 19th century.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

End the Election Integrity, Virality, Internet Observatory projects and all other projects designed to censor citizens, sway public opinion, and essentially serve as the government’s mouthpiece.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Start with ending Stanford's destructive Bias Reporting program, move all programs not associated with teaching and research off campus, end DEI, stop funding frivolous SHARE games and similar silly programs, trim the excessive and out-of-control administrative bureaucracy, present freedom of speech training at every new student orientation.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

A vibrant and creative undergraduate social life. Note Bene: Live-in selective social groups are critical. Die Luft der Freiheit Weit!  Both speech and activities.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Turning out students who can become functional citizens and future leaders in a diverse country: people willing to listen to two sides of a topic, people who understand two sides of an argument, people who are taught two sides of an argument, people who don't demonize those who disagree with them.

 

And while I am a proponent of free speech and academic freedom, it only works when there is some degree of viewpoint diversity, when the faculty and student body are not self-selected to primarily have one view.

 

And while I am also a big proponent of STEM, students need a grounding in our history and values, with all its good and bad, taught by professors focused on education not indoctrination, to allow our society to function constructively, and to resolve how to best use the advances that STEM will bring.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Emphasize meritocracy and end DEI racism. End the policy of prohibiting alums from taking the initiative to contact students. End discrimination against women applicants (favoring male applicants who are less qualified).

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Adopt and enforce the Chicago principles.

Over time, increase the population of faculty and staff who are more to the center and right politically.

Reduce the number of administrators.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Reestablish civility on campus.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Restore student life to the students.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

bottom of page